For at least a generation, national Republican leaders and those in Texas have identified the growing number of Hispanic-Americans as a prime ingredient in building a nationwide GOP majority.

And no wonder. Many Hispanics are Roman Catholic and considered conservative socially. They are the nation's fastest-growing ethnic group, and many live in politically important states. Half live in Texas, California and Florida, and such crucial swing states as Arizona, Colorado and Nevada have more than the national percentage of Hispanics.

Given their declared intent and those statistics, it seems startling that Republicans in Texas - and at least a dozen other states - seem determined to drive Hispanics and other minorities even further into the arms of the Democratic Party. That is one of the likely effects of the spate of new laws aimed at reversing the recent trend of making voting easier around the country.

According to the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, those laws include ones requiring voters to have state-issued identification cards and others designed to restrict early and absentee voting.

But these efforts are beginning to run awry of the Obama administration's Justice Department because, for the first time in the 47 years since the Voting Rights Act was passed to spur minority turnout, the department is in Democratic hands at the time of the census, taken every 10 years.

Earlier this year, the department challenged a Texas legislative and congressional redistricting plan that largely ignored the fact that 65 percent of the state's 10-year population growth was Hispanic. On the congressional level, the heavily Republican Legislature created four new seats with white Republican majorities, rather than draw two seats with Hispanic Democratic majorities.

In doing so, it ignored the state's congressional delegation's recommendation that the four seats be divided. Ultimately, a compromise was reached permitting this year's elections to proceed, but the long-term situation remains unresolved.

Last week, the Justice Department challenged the voter identification plan that the Legislature's Republican majority passed, which could have the effect of disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of the state's Hispanic voters.

In a March 12 letter to Texas Director of Elections Keith Ingram, Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez said Texas neither showed evidence of voter fraud requiring the measure nor proved that it "will not have a retrogressive effect."

In examining data submitted by Texas, Perez said the department concluded that Hispanics were less likely to have driver's licenses or other identification cards issued by the Department of Public Safety. It concluded that more than half a million registered voters lacked one or the other and that "a disproportionate share of those registered voters are Hispanic."

Under the Texas law, an applicant for an election identification certificate has to travel to a driver's license office. But the department noted that twice as many Hispanics don't have an available vehicle, and that 81 of the state's 254 counties don't have an operational driver's license office.

In opposing the department's claims, Texas is challenging the constitutionality of the portion of the Voting Rights Act that requires states with histories of voter discrimination to get advance approval of voting changes from either the Justice Department or the federal court in Washington.

Ultimately, the case could wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court, possibly before next November's election. So could a similar action against a new South Carolina voter ID law.

In neither case, will the court's ruling impact this year's presidential election since both Texas and South Carolina are reliably Republican. That might not be the case in Wisconsin, where a country judge has temporarily backed its new voter ID requirement.

But the long-term damage of such actions could be substantial, in Texas as well as in more competitive states. As the Hispanic population in Texas continues to grow, it should help the Democrats cut into current GOP majorities, especially if Republicans keep trying to make it harder for the Hispanics to vote.

Nationally, the GOP efforts to curb Hispanic voting and the anti-immigration views of top Republican candidates seem likely to keep the party's share of Hispanic voters at or below the 31 percent of 2008, rather than near the 40 percent President George W. Bush achieved in 2004.

(4) comments

djb12030
djb12030

awesome start to that first comment. "Asia is for Asians, Africa is for Africans." No one show him a picture of South Africa or Tiawan, it might break his brain to see white people on other continents.

warrencitizen

I think I just lost 2 minutes of my life that I'll never get back.....

forksmuggler
forksmuggler

Uh...what?

WhiteDude1

Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, White countries for everyone?

Everybody

says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will.

be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY.

into White countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more.

crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve.

this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote.

assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final.

solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY White.

countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-Whites.

What

if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be.

solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into.

EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries? How long would it.

take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am

talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem? And how long.

would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho.

black man wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious.

truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White.

race, Liberals and respectable conservatives will just say that I'm a.

naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.