With the success of &#8220The Lord of the Rings” trilogy, clearly Peter Jackson had a tough act to follow. Yet Jackson's follow-up, another remake of the epic adventure &#8220King Kong,” proves to be the right project for a director who clearly understands the art of the action genre.

&#8220Kong” does trudge along at times with a three-hour running time, but it still works, thanks to the final two-thirds in which each action sequence trumps the previous one.

&#8220King Kong” follows a film crew to a remote island in the 1930s. The film's director, Carl Denham (Jack Black), is desperate to finish his work and convinced that shooting on location in this remote land will be just what he needs to secure the picture's shaky financial backing.

Among the people joining Denham on this journey are Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts), a down-on-her-luck actress, and Jack Driscoll (Adrien Brody), a writer and friend of Denham's.

Once the group gets to the island, they get more than they bargained for, with a land full of prehistoric creatures and a 25-foot ape, which happens to develop an affection for Darrow.

Jackson takes a slow and methodical approach to the story, with Kong not appearing until over an hour into the film. But like that first climb on a rollercoaster, once the action picks up steam, it is nonstop.

Jackson fills the screen with one fabulous chase after another. It's like watching &#8220Jurassic Park” on amphetamines. There are dinosaurs, bats, man-sized insects - enough danger to fill three action movies.

The action doesn't let up once &#8220Kong” hits New York, with a finale atop the Empire State Building that left me gasping.

But &#8220King Kong” has more going for it than the action sequences. At its core, the film is a love story between woman and beast. Their love has a sense of credibility that gives &#8220Kong” a touch of tenderness and Jackson (and especially Watts) deserve praise for making that relationship work.

Black is also pretty good as the smarmy director, but Brody is stuck in a role that just doesn't display his talents.

This remake is sure to be compared to its two predecessors. It's been a while since I've seen the original and honestly, my only memory of the 1976 version centers around me sneaking into a theater to watch the last half of the film (a long story best saved for another day). With that in mind, I don't think I'm the one who can accurately compare the three films.

But I do know one thing - I enjoy a good action film just like the next person. And this isn't just a good action film, &#8220Kong” is a very good one.

&#8220King Kong”

Starring: Naomi Watts, Jack Black

Directed by: Peter Jackson

Rating: PG-13 for frightening adventure violence and disturbing images

Playing at: Great Escape 12, Highland Cinemas (Glasgow)

Grade: B+

- Sportswriter/movie reviewer Micheal Compton now has reviews available on the Web. Just go to http://www.bgdailynews.com and click on the Compton's Critiques link for a quick hit of movies now playing in the area. Micheal can also be reached via e-mail at mcompton@bgdailynews.com.

0
0
0
0
0

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.