Past time for Kentucky to accept facts about coal

Kentucky’s relationship with coal is a repeat performance of its dance with tobacco. As the rest of the country was tuning tobacco out as the medical evidence of pulmonary and vascular disease causation mounted, Kentucky dug in and continued to promote it, choosing to look the other way until the “feds” forced the issue. The economics of the situation obviously steered the state in a “protectionist” direction but it was still the wrong thing to do.

This delaying action only increased the eventual pain an collateral damage. The state now (finally) promotes smoking cessation.

Kentucky is doing the same thing again; this time with coal, despite the coal “barons’ ” regular use of bankruptcy (and running away with the money) to avoid paying its workers and the mandatory cleaning up of their messes. There is no controversy regarding the harm. Burning coal releases cancer-causing toxins and particulates into the air and the residual ash leaches into the water, clandestinely distributing even more of the same. The carbon dioxide production (POTUS opinion not withstanding) is even more threatening as global average temperatures irrefutably continue to rise.

The state’s current coal position is akin to saying bourbon is good for our financial bottom line, so drink as much as you can and have a good time regardless of your toasted liver and highway fatalities. This stand is indefensible, but it reflects Kentucky’s consistent resistance to change when updated information becomes available. Our state refuses to submit to the facts, isolating our state from most of the country, and setting us up for a very hard fall when the “feds” (and this time the banks) say “no” to coal and its consequences.

In acknowledgement, I suggest we change our (apparently) debonnaire blackout license plate to read “Coal: Keeps the blinders on.” No doubt I will get strong legislative support!

Gary Verst

Bowling Green

8
0
0
0
3

(1) comment

Enough Already

There is a big difference between tobacco and coal. For tobacco no replacement is necessary because you do not need it to live in the present day world. Coal on the other hand is plentiful and a cheap source of energy to power today's lifestyles.

Not everyone can afford renewable energy sources because 1, they are expensive and 2, they are not dependable nor scalable to the amount necessary to replace coal. You will say nuclear is dangerous even though it is inexpensive and the least polluting of all. Hydro has alreay maxed out. That leaves natural gas, but it is more expensive than coal. Under Obama, coal was made expensive to push other fuel sources. Now that coal killing anti-competitive rules have been repealed coal is once again the low cost fuel. Unfortunately Obama succeeded in driving up our energy costs with the conversion of power plants to natural gas, joke windmills, and silly solar farms. When natural gas becomes the cheapest way to go, you won't have to force power companies to convert plants with anti-competitive laws but they are still going to produce carbon emissions. I know that terrifies you. If government would get out of the way this will happen when the market will support it and power bills will not go up drastically to "save the planet".

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.