The process of confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court and the reactions of the Democrat senators is yet another example of how politicians can resort to hypocrisy and shamefully distort clear facts.

From the moment of nomination of Barrett up to her confirmation, the Democrats’ main argument was the “precedence” and in their view, the “unfairness” of appointment of a justice during the presidential election. Perhaps it would be helpful to remind them that 14 U.S. presidents appointed 21 justices during the election year. Furthermore, six lame-duck presidents appointed justices when their successors had already been elected.

The fact is that presidents are elected to be in the office for full four years and even in the last minute of their term they have all the powers that the Constitution grants them.

The Democrats repeatedly refer to President Barack Obama’s nominee, Judge Garland, who was rejected by the Republican Senate in 2016. Well, if the appointment of a justice to the Supreme Court during the election year is not “fair,” why did Obama make that nomination? And if the Democrats had the Senate majority in that year, wouldn’t Garland be sitting on the Supreme Court? Even the late Justice Ruth Ginsberg at that time declared that a president has the constitutional authority to appoint a justice at any time during his term in the office.

Within the framework of the U.S. Constitution the presidents have certain powers and there’s nothing “unfair” about it if they exercise those powers. A more powerful fighter wins the fight fair and square, as long as he follows the regulations. The challenges in the politics are exactly the same. The Republicans in the Senate had the power and exercised it justly.

Mort Shahmir

Bowling Green

(5) comments


Perhaps the hypocrisy of the Republicans regarding the refusal to allow president Obama to appoint a SCOTUS justice, only to rush an appointment of a judge with only three years experience may have been legal, it will be detrimental toward bipartisanship efforts in the future. This climate of defiance from the GOP, is unquestionably un-American.

Enough Already

No hypocrisy here, this has been done many times in the past by BOTH parties and you being ignorant of the fact say volumes.

It happens sucessfully when the party of the president also controls the Senate. It would be weak and stupid to do otherwise. The left is wrong, as usual...


Prior occurrence of past wrongs does not make a right. If the tables were turned, I have very little doubt you would be outraged.


Surely, you jest!


The Constitution was followed, Obama nominated and the senate did not consent, No where does it say a hearing has to be held.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.